Antipopes
& The Apocalypse Now
By:
Mary Elaine Murray
An antipope is an invalid pope. The definitions
on Internet saying that an antipope is a false claimant in opposition to a
sitting pope are not correct. In the history of the Papacy there were antipopes
when there was no legitimate pope. Antipope Eulalius 418-419 was invalidly
elected after the death of Pope Zozimus. Pope Boniface was validly elected and
Eulalius was ejected. As the following dogmatic teachings show, a valid pope
can also lose his office through heresy or apostasy and become an antipope. Whereas
a sinful or incompetent pope does not lose his office, as Pope Pius XII
explains: “Not every sin, however grave
it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the body of the Church
as does schism or heresy or apostasy... only those are to be included as
members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith.” (Mystici
Corporis, 23, 22). Therefore, a man that is a heretic when he is elected
would also be an antipope. This blog shows how this has come to pass since the
death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. The New World Order establishment took over the
Church and placed their own man on the Papal chair. Behind the New World Order
is Freemasonry which has been identified by the Popes as being the enemies of
the Church having an agenda to destroy Catholicism. More about them ahead. Pope
Leo XIII said in his encyclical Satis
Cognitum translated On the Unity of
the Church: “We should believe not
otherwise than as has been handed down by the tradition of the Church of God...
The doctrine of the Apostles is the true faith.” Therefore, if even a pope
does not profess this faith, but only a mutilated form of it, he is what is
called a heretic, and heresy severs from the Church, as the following Papal
Bull shows:
Pope
Paul IV, Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio,
Feb. 15, 1559: “6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain
valid in perpetuity, We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever
at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an
Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman
Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman
Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman
Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:
(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested
and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and
worthless; (ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor
for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of
the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of
administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or
Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any
period of time in the foregoing situation; (iii) it shall not be held as
partially legitimate in any way… (vi) those thus promoted or elevated
shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration,
of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power… by
this
Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity…”. See: Vatican Catholic. com. & TraditionalMass.org.
“Forever, O
Lord, Thy word stands firm in Heaven. Thy truth unto all generations.” (Psalm
118: 89, 90).
Amen, amen I say
to you: He that enters not into the door of the sheepfold, but climbeth up
another way, the same is a thief and a robber. But he that enters in by the
door is the shepherd of the sheep... a stranger they follow not, but fly from
him because they know not the voice of strangers... Jesus therefore said to
them again: I am the door of the sheep... by Me, if any man enter in, he shall
be saved... the thief comes not, but to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I
am come that they may have life, and may have it more abundantly,” (Jn. 10:
1-10).
Quotes from the Douay-Rheims Bible, canonically sanctioned by the Council of
Trent and the Council of Carthage - the true original Bible.
In
1917 The Blessed Virgin Mary gave three little shepherd children three secrets.
Two of them have been made public. The third one was to be made public in 1960,
according to the last living seer, but it never was made public, because it
predicted apostasy in high places.
In
1984: "In Cardinal Ratzinger's (now Benedict
XVI) declaration to Vittorio Messori...
After stating that he had read the third secret, the Prefect of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith answered the journalist, who asked
why this secret was still not revealed: 'Because, according to the judgment of
the Popes, it adds nothing to what a Christian must already know from
Revelation: a radical call to conversion, the absolute gravity of
history, dangers threatening the life and faith of the Christian, and
therefore, the world. And also the importance of the "last times"...
But the things contained in this third secret correspond to what is announced
in Scripture, and are confirmed by many other Marian apparitions, beginning
with the Fatima apparitions themselves in their known contents. Conversion and
penance are essential conditions for salvation. To publish the third secret
would mean exposing the Church to the danger of sensationalism, exploitation of
the content'." (The Whole Truth
About The Third Secret", p.771, pt. 3, ch.7, by Frere Michel De La Saint
Trinite).
The
version of the third secret made public in 2,000 was a laughable hoax that
represents the back-pedalling shown by the following statement and it does not
correspond to the above, which was described in a more honest moment, or to the
Fatima message itself.
In
1996: An Eastern Rite of the Catholic Church 1997 newsletter of the Eparchy
of New Westminster, Summer edition, carried the following story from
"Challenge Magazine" 1996:
"The much discussed 'third secret of Fatima' is not
sensational or Apocalyptic, said Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger... to all the
curious, I would say I am certain that the Virgin does not engage in
sensationalism. She does not create fear, she does not present Apocalyptic
visions, but guides people to her Son. That is what is essential... The Church
is opposed to sensationalism and this expectation of unheard things. It would
be a perversion to give in to such pressures by publishing 'the third secret'
he said. 'Instead, the intention and centrality of the mission of the Church is
to guide people towards those things that are truly important' he said".
If
the real third secret was really as goofy and mundane as the 2000 version of
it, then why was there all the fuss about releasing it? The truth is obviously
because the 2,000 version is not the real third secret which calls for: “a radical call to conversion, the absolute
gravity of history, dangers threatening the life and faith of the Christian,
and therefore, the world. And also the importance of the "last
times"... But the things contained in this third secret correspond to what
is announced in Scripture, and are confirmed by many other Marian apparitions,
beginning with the Fatima apparitions themselves in their known contents... To
publish the third secret would mean exposing the Church to the danger of
sensationalism, exploitation of the content'.” The only third secret
content that would fit this description and the fear the Vatican has had about
making it public, is because the Vatican is now run by clerics who are not
servants of Jesus Christ, but of worldly powers bent on stamping out the true
faith of the Catholic Church. This would relate to the historical war of
Freemasonry and the Synagogue against the Church: The absolute gravity of history, dangers threatening the life and
faith of the Christian,” and their infiltration and takeover of the Church,
putting their own anti-Christian man on the papal chair to wreak the havoc on
the faith and life of the Christian that the abominations of Vatican II have
wrought. Those are the things that would expose the Church to “the danger of sensationalism.” Also,
none of the approved Marian apparitions and “what
is announced in Scripture” speak of what the 2,000 version of the third
secret alleged. But the Marian apparitions and Sacred Scripture did speak of an
unprecedented apostasy in the Vatican and the vacancy of the papal chair.
When the Fatima seer wrote down the contents of the third secret
at the request of Church authorities, she ended the second secret already made
public and began the third secret with the words: “In Portugal the dogma of the faith will always remain...” meaning
that elsewhere it will not. “Other Marian
apparitions” Cardinal Ratzinger was referring to, would be La Salette in
1846, when the Blessed Virgin said: “Rome
will lose the Faith and become the seat of Antichrist”. At Quito in 1594
the Blessed Virgin spoke of the loss of faith in the second half of the 20th
century, and that the Church would go through a dark night without a shepherd
(shepherds are Popes and Bishops). These messages were approved by Church
authorities of indisputable validity before 1958. These Marian apparitions and
their messages speak of this crisis period as an in-between period until an
eventual glorious restoration of the Church throughout the world. At the
present it seems as if this could only happen by an extraordinary intervention
of God similar to the flood, or “the three days darkness,” a prediction still
awaiting fulfillment. See more about “the three days darkness” on my blog:
thecatholicchurchandthenewworldorder.blogspot.com
So what happened in 1960 that could correspond to an almost
universal apostasy reaching even to the top of the Church? In 1958 Angelo Roncalli
became Pope John XXIII. He ushered in a Church council called Vatican II. This
council introduced everything the Church had condemned before 1958.
The official Churches current conservative stance on abortion, contraception
and women’s ordination are only a smokescreen to deflect attention away from
the larger issues, such as the fact that Vatican authorities began to
contradict the dogma of the faith that teaches that “outside the Catholic
Church there is no salvation,” by saying that salvation is possible in
religions besides Catholicism and even besides Christianity, and they are also
saying that these false religions which the Church has always taught to be
works of the Devil which lead only to Hell are ways to God. The Vatican itself
has forced governments to suppress the Catholic faith and remove it from the
state constitutions as the state religion of Catholic nations. The Popes of
indisputable authority before 1958 said that this was apostasy, for example,
Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas; and Pope
Leo XIII in Tametsi said: “As with individuals, so with nations...
first to have known Him (Jesus Christ),
and afterwards to deny or forget Him, is a crime so foul and insane that it seems
impossible for any man to be guilty of it.” Such a thing is in
contradiction to the dogma of the faith as set forth by the same pope in his
encyclical: The Christian Constitution of
States (Immortali Dei). The Antipopes after 1958 also took away the Mass
and the sacraments and replaced them with invalid counterfeits. The post
Vatican II church has institutionalized the heresy Pope St. Pius X condemned in
his encyclical Pascendi, calling it “the synthesis of all heresies.” The
Vatican II Antipopes praise, encourage and participate in false religions -
conduct which the Church and the Bible have always condemned as apostasy and
compared to spiritual adultery and fornication. Indeed, the whole trajectory of
Catholicism has been jettisoned by the new establishment since the death of
Pope Pius XII in 1958. Catholics who stopped going to Church in the early
1960s, but who started going to Church again decades later, found the Church so
changed that it was not the same institution that they remembered. But how
Catholic could the new Church establishment be if they’re saying no to
abortion, contraception and women’s ordination when the Latin rite hasn’t
ordained a valid male priest since 1968, and if the new establishment is
leading the people into idolatry, false religion, and atheism, as Pope Leo XIII
said putting the true religion on par with false religions leads to? “But the wrath of God is revealed from
Heaven against all ungodliness and injustice of those men that detain the truth
of God in injustice.” (Rom. 1: 18).
Our
Lady of Fatima gave Lucia to understand that we are living in the end times and
that the prophecies of Sacred Scripture relating thereto now apply. She may
have been referring to the words of St. Paul in his second letter to the
Thessalonians predicting the great apostasy that will take place towards the
end of the world signifying the return of the Lord Jesus Christ to judge the
living and the dead. St. Paul gave this prophecy to quell rumours running
rampant in those times that the day of the Lord was at hand. St. Paul said that
the day of the Lord will not come unless the great apostasy (“the revolt”)
comes first and the man of sin be revealed who will lift himself up above God
and all that is called God, which the humanist Antipopes of Vatican II have
certainly done! To qualify for the “man of sin” designation it is not necessary
that sins of the flesh be evident, because partaking with false religions was
called adultery and the most serious of sins by Sacred Scripture. A great
apostasy or a revolt could only come from the failure of the Church hierarchy,
because as long as the hierarchy is keeping the faith, the people will keep the
faith. The following quote may also refer to what Our Lady of Fatima said about
the third secret of Fatima and about Russia spreading her errors* throughout
the world, in the second secret made public. “Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt
first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth, and
is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he
sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. Remember you
not, that when I was with you, I told you these things? And now you know what
withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity
already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out
of the way. And then that wicked one will be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall
kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of His
coming, him, whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power,
and signs, and lying wonders. And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish;
because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore
God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying; that all may be
judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity...
Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have
learned, whether by word, or by out epistle.” (2 Thess. 2: 3-14).
* When the Blessed Virgin spoke of Russia
spreading her errors, she was not referring to the figurehead leaders of the
country. The world wide revolution which spread into the Vatican and comprises
the New World Order, got its foothold in Russia in 1917. It is also significant
that Ashkenazi Jews who make up the ruling element of the world wide
revolutionary movement, are a Southern Russian people called Khazars who
converted to the Synagogue at the end of the 1st millennia.
There
are many prophecies in Sacred Scripture concerning the end times, not the least
striking of which is the prophecy in the Book of Daniel of the taking away of
the Eternal Sacrifice, which obviously refers to what Paul VI did to the Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass replacing it with his Lutheran supper service which they
continue to pretend is a Catholic Mass. “And
he shall speak words against the High One, and shall crush the saints of the
most High: and he shall think himself able to change times and laws, and they
shall be delivered into his hand until a time, and times, and half a time...
And it was magnified even to the prince of the strength: and it took away from
him the continual sacrifice, and cast down the place of the sanctuary.” (Daniel
7: 25 & 8: 11). I believe that the
“Prince of the Strength” refers to St. Peter because the Popes sit on the
Chair of St. Peter and are referred to collectively as Peter.
Another
prophecy of Sacred Scripture announcing the events of the end times that Our
Lady of Fatima could be referring to in the third secret would be the
following: “And I saw another beast
coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as
a dragon. And he executed all the power of the former beast in his sight; and
he caused the earth, and them that dwell therein, to adore the first beast,
whose wound to death was healed” (Apocalypse 13: 11,12).
Comment: A beast in
apocalyptic terms is a power without truth, without morals, and without true
justice, so that it only deserves to be described as a beast. If the Russian
revolution of 1917, and the Spanish Civil War in 1936, and the communist
revolution of 1810 in Mexico are to be taken into consideration, it is also a
very vicious beast. Thus, the first beast would be Freemasonry which is behind
the New World Order. “Another beast coming up out of the earth having two horns
like a lamb, that spoke as a dragon” would be a prophecy of an Antipope in the
service of Freemasonry. That is an interpretation held by orthodox Biblical
exegetes such as Rev. H.B. Kramer in his work The Book Of Destiny, P. 319, which carries an Eccliastical
imprimatur (Church approval). In Pope Pius XII encyclical Mystici Corporis (31) the Pope says that the Church is symbolized
by the earth. Therefore the beast coming up out of the earth would be a chief
ruler coming up out of the Church. “Having horns like a lamb”: in the Bible,
horns symbolize power. “Like a lamb”, would refer to Jesus Christ, the lamb of
God, meaning the temporal and spiritual authority of the Pope. “He spoke as a
dragon.” The dragon is a symbol of Satan. This apparent Pope would be a heretic
speaking apostasy. “He executed all the power of the former beast in his
sight.” In other words this antipope would be entirely under the control of
Freemasonry. Only an apparent Pope could cause “the earth and them that dwell
therein, to adore the first beast, whose wound to death was healed.” The wound
to death that was healed would be referring to anathemas, excommunications and
Church censures that gave Freemasonry and its child Socialism and Communism a
wound to death by former true Popes.
That
is what happened after 1958 with the succession of Antipopes elected beginning
with John XXIII, as shown ahead. There is no question here of misunderstanding
or of a difference of opinion. What is at issue is the occurrence of Popes and
a Council after 1958 teaching what Popes and Councils before 1958 condemned,
what Sacred Scripture condemned, or contradicting Catholic doctrines that are
well defined and clear. No heresies in history have been so grave and obvious
as have the heresies of Vatican II and its bearers. The letter of St.
Alexander, Patriarch Bishop, in 321 excommunicating the heretic Arius and his
supporters says: “Now the apostates are
these --- and the novelties they have invented and put forth contrary to the
Scriptures...” St. Athanasius Defender of the Faith, p. 3, by Michael Davies.
The
Pope is the supreme pastor but he does not make up his own religion, he
reiterates what the doctrine revealed by God calls for, or how it applies in a
given situation. The Papacy was instituted by Jesus Christ to guard the deposit
of Divine revelation which ended with the death of the last Apostle, and to
hand it on to all people of all time, pure and undefiled. "For the Holy Spirit was not promised
to the successors of Peter, that by His revelation they might make known new
doctrine, but that by His
assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation or
deposit of faith delivered through the Apostles" (Concerning the Infallible Teaching of the Roman Pontiff, Vatican
Council, 1870, from Dogmatic
Canons and Decrees, P. 254, from Tan
Books). Even the Pope may not tamper with one iota of what is of
Divine ordinance: “For I testify to
everyone that hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall
add to these things. God shall add to unto him the plagues written in this
book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the
holy city, and from these things that are written in this book.” (Apocalypse
22: 18,19). As Pope Gregory XVI says quoting Pope Agatho 687-681: “Nothing of these things ought to be
diminished; nothing changed; nothing added; but they must be preserved both as
regards expression and meaning.” (Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, 1832). Because
of this, and because the men who were Popes were partisans of Jesus Christ, no
Pope has ever contradicted another until 1958. In 1958 men who were not
partisans of Jesus Christ, but partisans of the enemies of Jesus Christ got possession
of the Vatican, and began to contradict what the Popes and Councils before 1958
and Sacred Scripture taught.
Although
the divinely appointed role of the Popes and the episcopate is to be the
guardians and teachers of the deposit of faith – guardians of the Ark of the
Covenant, the people are not so doomed to depend exclusively on them that if
they go astray like the majority of bishops did at the time of the Arian heresy
in the 4th century, that the
people have to follow them out of the Catholic Church and out of
salvation. On the contrary, each Catholic is obliged to keep the Catholic faith
whole and undefiled as a condition of salvation: “Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he
hold the Catholic Faith. Which Faith, except each one do keep whole and
undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.” (The Athanasian
Creed). Many heresies throughout history began from bishops. During the
Arian heresy Pope Liberius was not a heretic himself, but he compromised with
Arian heretics and excommunicated St. Athanasius who opposed the Arians. St.
Athanasius stood firm, and was exonerated in time, and he is now a great Saint
and a Doctor of the Church. Therefore, each Catholic has the responsibility of
knowing his faith, keeping his faith, explaining it to inquirers. “It is to be ascribed to this divine
revelation that such truths among these things divine as of themselves are not
beyond human reason can, even in the present condition of mankind, be known by
everyone with facility, with firm assurance, and with no admixture of error.”
(Dogmatic Constitution On The Catholic Faith: Of Revelation, Pope Pius IX,
1870). For more about the faith of Catholics google: Catholic Harbour Of
Faith and Morals.
But
what happens if Catholics resist a Pope that is a heretic, does that make them
schismatics? No it does not, because “whoever
is a heretic is also a schismatic,” says St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, vol. 3, Q. 39, “On
Schism:” 1st Article. A Pope that is a heretic is severed from the
Church, and his office becomes vacant. There is no Pope, only the appearance of
one!
St. Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and
Doctor of the Church,
De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: “A pope who is a manifest heretic
automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases
automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can
be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient
Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction...
This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as
Cajetan himself admits (ib, c. 26). The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a
member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a
manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian
(lib. 4, epist. 2), St. Athanasius (Scr. 2, Cont. Arian), St. Augustine (lib.
De great. Christ. Cap.20), St. Jerome (contra Lucifer.) and others; therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be
Pope.”
Canon Law
1917: Canon 188: 4: "All
offices shall be vacant ispo facto by tacit resignation in the following
cases... If a cleric has publicly lapsed from the Catholic Faith".
The Rule Of
Faith, guides even the Popes, the Church
Councils, and the Apostles themselves, see: Rom. 12: 6 & 2 Cor. 10: 13.
This is as follows: "1.)
Sacred Scripture. 2.) The Apostolic Traditions. 3.) The Authority of the Church. 4.) The Authority of the Councils. 5.) The Fathers of the Church. 6.) The Authority of the Pope. 7.) Miracles.
8.) The Harmony of Faith and Reason" (St. Francis De Sales, The
Catholic Controversy, Table of Contents, from Tan Books, Phone:
1-800-467-5876).
St.
Vincent of Lerins, 434 A.D., famous Commonitory,
Ch. 3, Explanation of The Rule Of Faith says: "... What if some novel contagion, seek to infect not merely an
insignificant portion of the Church, but the whole? Then it will be his care to
cleave to antiquity... collate, consult, interrogate the opinions of the
ancients... living in different times and places, yet continuing in the
communion and faith of the one Catholic Church, stand forth acknowledged and
approved authorities... to have been taught, written and held, not by one or
two of these only, but by all, equally, with one consent, openly,
frequently, persistently, is to be believed without any doubt or
hesitation".
John XXIII: When John XXIII was elevated to the
cardinalate before he was elected Pope, he insisted on receiving the red hat
from the atheist and notoriously anti-Catholic socialist Vincent Auriol,
President of France, whom he knelt before.
A
well respected Church journal put out by the Jesuits called 30 Days Magazine,
issue No. 2, 1994, P. 25 held an interview with the head of Italian Freemasons
who said that John XXIII was a Freemason. The Grand Master of the Grand Orient
said: “As for that, it seems that John
XXIII was initiated in Paris and participated in the work of the Istanbul
Workshops.”
The Enemies Of The Church: Freemasons have
been repeatedly condemned by the Church since 1738 after they constituted
themselves in their present form in 1717. Pope Leo XIII called them “the Kingdom
of Satan” in his encyclical: On
Freemasonry. The Popes said that they were the irreconcilable enemies of
Jesus Christ having an agenda to destroy the Church. Their sources indicate
that they plan to do this by taking it over and transforming it from being the
kingdom of Christ into an institution in the image and likeness of Freemasonry.
After all, one cannot destroy an institution unless one gets inside of it, and
to the top of it. In that way, the threat of a Pope or Bishops defending the
Church against a Masonic campaign of lies is averted. In that way, policies and
even doctrine can be made or unmade to suit Freemasonry. What fox wants to stay
outside the chickencoop? In the year 1917 Freemasons paraded before the Vatican
with a flag depicting Satan conquering and trampling underfoot St. Michael the
Archangel. They taunted: “Satan will
reign in the Vatican and the Pope will be his servant.” (Militia Immaculatae of
Fr. Maximillian Kolbe, P. 5, by Fr. Karl Stehlin, SSPX).
They
also try to stamp out Catholicism by spreading licentiousness and by enforcing
their own brand of education and prohibiting Catholic education which is vastly
superior, and does not produce semi-literate graduates from high school as
Masonic education does. The Catholic schools taken over by this element shelved
Catholic education in the 1960s and imposed Masonic curricula such as is found
in the public schools. As the result, millions of the upcoming generations of
Catholics are being robbed of their heritage and religious liberty which does
not exist if the right to a Catholic education is taken away de facto. You can
be Catholic, they say, but there are only Masonic schools. Imagine a Catholic
country that said you can be atheist or Sikh if you choose but your children
can only be educated Catholic? I believe that the so called residential schools propaganda is a
hoax. I went to 5 different Catholic convent boarding schools taught by
preVatican II nuns which are the same thing as residential schools and there
was no sexual abuse and no possibility that it could have gone on. The nuns
were the best of teachers and truly admirable. I never saw anyone mistreated by
them, and besides the school I went to, I had friends who went to others, and
the good experience was the same everywhere. The teachers of the present day
consistently allow bullying to go on, and they do nothing to punish the bully. The
victims of bullies are so tormented that many of them are driven to commit
suicide. Such a thing could not have gone on in the schools I went to. The
pre-Vatican II Catholic schools taught by nuns for the girls and brothers of
priests for the boys were far better than the degenerate public schools of the
present. There was corporal punishment in those schools (they were all the
same, if you’ve seen one you’ve seen them all), but it was hardly ever used and
then very mildly. Corporal punishment is beneficial when it is warranted and
proportionate. Indeed a few whacks of the strap or cane would teach a bully a
lesson, and save a life. The effect of the present public school policy is to
punish the innocent and to protect the guilty.
If
there really was sexual abuse in some residential schools, then it was due to
the fact that Freemasonry had gotten control of some religious institutes,
because in the 1950s, ‘60s, and 70s, most seminaries and religious orders were
in the control of homosexuals that Freemasonry had endeavoured to flood these
institutes with (if they had control of them in the ‘50’s, they were working
their way up far earlier). This was testified to by some of the good old guard
priests such as the late Fr. John O’Connor who had his faculties taken away for
complaining about the homosexual pedophiles running Catholic seminaries and
religious orders as far back as the 1950s, and by works such as Good-Bye Good Men by Michael Rose. By
the 1950’s these institutes were so under the control of infiltrators that one
could not get a good Catholic boy into a priestly seminary in some parts of the
U.S. In contrast to this, in 1902 Pope Leo XIII pleaded the cause of the
religious orders against the persecution they were undergoing from the Masonic
controlled governments of the time, and he pointed out that the religious
orders were blameless and above reproach: “Nothing
was of avail to save them, neither the integrity of their life which their
enemies were unable to assail...” (Review of Our Pontificate, by Pope Leo
XIII). Something obviously happened in the meantime to make what was so out
of character to happen all of a sudden. The Catholic way is against sin and
engenders virgins and married people who are faithful to each other for life.
Sexual abuse is in the genre of sin. The enemies of the Catholic faith are of
the genre of sin and they beget all that is sin, by their persuasion, and by
their suppression of truly Catholic education which regulates human behaviour
away from sin.
Pope Leo XII, Quo Graviora, 1826: “Our predecessor of happy memory, Pope Clement
XII... has forever condemned and prohibited... deLiberi-Muratori or
Francs-Macons or identified by whatever other designation... under pain of excommunication
ispo facto without any declaration needing to be incurred, from which
no-one would be able to be absolved by any other than the Roman Pontiff then
reigning, unless on the point of death, so that anyone might not dare or
presume to enter or propagate, or to foster, receive, conceal societies of this
kind, to be inscribed in, attached to or be among them or otherwise involved...
there have been some who have not hesitated to declare and to boast openly that
the stated penalty of excommunication imposed by Our predecessor, as shown
above, no longer carries any force... as if in fact express confirmation of a
Pontifical successor were required for the continuation of Apostolic
constitutions... Our disposition and steadfast and deliberate will in regard to
the force and continuance of the censures imposed by Clement, our predecessor,
as is shown above, ought clearly enough to be concluded... We explicitly condemn and declare invalid
particularly that clearly impious and accursed oath, by which they bind those
who are received into these sects... as by Our present constitution, perpetually valid... ” (Ibid. 4,2,7). Available from Angelus
Press.
Note: If the Popes after 1958 are invalid, so are
all their enactments, especially their relaxations of the penalties incurred
for membership in Freemasonry. Therefore, what was in force until 1958, is
still Church law, especially what is stipulated as “perpetually valid”.
That
is what all the Ecumenism since the 1960s is about. The Lodge teaches that all
religions are equal and that they should all get together and pray together.
This may seem warm and fuzzy to those who do not know religion. However, God is
a God of truth, and truth must be exclusive, as the Catholic Church has always
taught, and as the Bible taught: “But the
things the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to Devils, and not to God.” (1
Cor. 10: 20). Ecumenism is a flagrant violation of the First Commandment
(Ex. 20), and it was condemned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Mortalium Animos in 1926, as “tantamount to abandoning the religion
revealed by God” (Ibid. 2).
“This
limpid and impetuous stream has been harnessed in its course by the modern
enemies of the Church and is now no more than a miserable affluent of the great
movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of
a one-world Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy; neither
discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions; and which, under the
pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world the reign
of legalized and cunning force, and the oppression of the weak and of those who
toil and suffer” (Pope St. Pius X, Our Apostolic Mandate, 40, in
1910).
There is
compelling evidence of fraud during the elections that installed John
XXIII and Paul VI as Pope. Declassified reports from the United States Department
of State, Feb. 28, 1994 confirms the testimony of Fr. Malachi Martin, a Vatican
insider, in addition to another member of Vatican staff present during the
conclave, that Cardinal Siri was really elected Pope in the 1963 conclave.
Other Catholic sources say that Cardinal Tadeschini was elected in the 1958
conclave, but that influences bearing on the conclave from B’nai B’rith (Jews
who control Freemasonry) caused the true election to be suppressed and John
XXIII to be imposed instead. In an interview with Louis Remy, when asked if he
had been elected Pope, Cardinal Siri paused and collected himself before answering
and he said: “I am bound by the secret.
This secret is horrible... Very serious things have taken place, but I cannot
say anything.” Similarly, Paul Scortesco, the cousin of the president of
The Noble Guard supervising the Conclaves issued a public letter indicating the
above, that there was communication with the outside, and that the men that
appeared on the balconies as apparent Popes, were not the ones truly elected.
Paul Scortesco was found burned to death in his bed shortly after he made that
letter public.
John
XXIII taught heresy before he was elected Pope, for which he never made an
abjuration. Before he was elected Pope he was kicked out of the Lateran
Seminary for teaching Communism, which is an anti-God, anti-Catholic philosophy
which is an emanation of Freemasonry. He continued the same course after he was
elected Pope.
"In July 1949, His Holiness Pope Pius XII approved a Decree from The Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office which declared
that Catholics who profess, and particularly those who defend and spread the
materialist and anti-Christian doctrine of the Communists "ispo
facto" as apostates from the Catholic Faith who incur excommunication
specially reserved to the Holy See" (Selection of Letters and Addresses of Pope Pius XII, imprimatured 1958,
arranged by Maurice Quinlan).
“The encyclical
“Pacem In Terris” is a vigorous statement of Masonic doctrine...,” said the
Masonic Bulletin, the official organ of the Supreme Council of the 33rd
Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Masons, for the Masonic
District of the United States of Mexico, located at 56 Lucerna Street, Mexico,
D.F. (Year 18, No. 220, May 1963). (The Truth About What Really Happened To The
Catholic Church After Vatican II, P. 134, By Br.s Michael and Peter Dimond,
Most Holy Family Monastery.com).
John
XXIII inaugurated the heretical and blasphemous Vatican II in 1962, which made
the Church unrecognizable, and filled it with the most unbelievable blasphemy,
heresy, and apostasy. It accomplished the Masonic agenda to transform the
Catholic Church from the Church of Jesus Christ into an institution in the
image and likeness of Freemasonry. The unbelievable sacrileges and weird antics
that began to take place in Catholic Churches of the 60s, 70s & 80s was
toned down to a greater conservatism in recent years. But the new Vatican II
Church must be judged, not by the window dressing of recent years, but by what
it showed itself to be from the 1960s. Yet even the return of Latin is no
substantial change to the Masonic content of the Vatican II Church. It is the
same old heresy and apostasy in conservative garb. You can’t make a silk purse
out of a sow’s ear. The Vatican II Church is the Church of the revolution, not
the Church of Jesus Christ as the Church of the Popes before 1958 was. Even
Benedict XVI said that there was no going back to the Church of the Syllabus
(that is, the Syllabus cataloguing modern errors compiled by Pope Pius IX),
thus acknowledging that the Vatican II system is a new religion and another
Church, like the Church of England which began in the 16th century
by taking over the premises owned by the Catholic Church.
“Not only do
they subvert doctrine, but in doing so they even employ the exact phraseology,
verbatim, which the Church has condemned… In Vatican II’s Decree on Ecumenism,
we read the following: ‘Most valuable for this purpose are meetings of the two
sides – especially for discussions of theological problems – where each can
treat with the other on equal footing’. This teaching of Vatican II refers to
“ecumenical dialogue” between Catholics and non-Catholics… Compare their words
“equal footing” with the following teaching of Pope Leo XIII: ‘The Church, indeed,
deems it unlawful to place the various forms of divine worship on the same
footing as the true religion.’ Encyclical ‘Immortale Dei’.” (The Robber Church, Pt. 1, by Patrick Henry Omlor).
Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, 1832: “It is obviously absurd and injurious to
propose a certain ‘restoration and regeneration’ for her as though necessary
for her safety and growth, as if she could be considered subject to defect or
obscuration or other misfortune. Indeed authors of novelties consider that a
‘foundation may be laid of a new human institution,’ and what Cyprian detested
may come to pass, that what was a divine thing ‘may become a human church.’” (Popes
Against Modern Errors, 16 Papal Documents, from Tan Books).
The
“Popes” that came after John XXIII were even worse. They openly espoused
apostasy and flouted the first Commandment.
Paul VI was installed
after John XXIII. He continued Vatican II, and abolished the true Mass of the
Western rite, and replaced it with a man centred ceremony, founded on the
Masonic ideology which Pope Pius X condemned in his encyclical Pascendi, in 1907. The true Mass is the
unbloody re-enactment of the eternal sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the Cross at
Calvary. It was instituted by Jesus Christ Himself before He was crucified
(Luke 22: 19, 20). Christ gave the basic form of the Mass, but He left it up to
His Apostles to give it a further ceremony. Pope St. Puis V perfected this for
the Latin or Western rite in 1570 and fixed it irrevocably by law and with an
anathema, because when something is perfect, it cannot be improved upon. Hence,
any attempt to tamper with it could not be made without heresy or treason. The
comparison alone of the ancient rite of Mass with Paul VI new rite in the 1960s
is sufficient to prove this point. The so called new Mass instituted in the
1960s by Paul VI tampers with the basic form instituted by Jesus Christ and
effectively destroys it. The true Mass instituted by Jesus Christ perpetuates
His sacrifice on Calvary, and it propitiates God for the sins of the living and
those who died with all mortal sins forgiven (by sacramental absolution). The
new 1960s Mass does not do this. Being founded on a heresy condemned in 1907,
the new Mass is not even Catholic, therefore how can it satisfy the Sunday
obligation? Paul VI also changed the rite of priestly ordination for an invalid
one. The priests ordained since 1968 and the Bishops consecrated since then are
all invalid, say learned traditional priests and canonists: TraditionalMass.org.
That would effectively end the Apostolic succession. Abolishing the Apostolic
succession is necessary to any serious plot to destroy the true religion of
Jesus Christ.
“The earth is
infected by the inhabitants thereof: because they have transgressed the laws,
they have changed the ordinance, they have broken the everlasting covenant.
Therefore shall a curse devour the earth, and the inhabitants thereof shall
sin.” (Isaias 24: 5,6).
Paul
VI taught the worship of man instead of God, and Ecumenism condemned by the
First Commandment (Exodus 20), and by Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos in 1926. Ecumenism was condemned by other Popes
under the name of “indifferentism” by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos, by Pope Pius IX in Quanta
Cura, and in The Syllabus of Errors, by
Pope Leo III in On Freemasonry, and On Human Liberty, and by Pope St. Pius X
in Our Apostolic Mandate.
Pope Paul VI address closing Vatican II, Dec. 7, 1965, "The
Church of the Council, it is true, has been very much occupied with man... man
completely occupied with himself, man who not only makes himself the centre of
everything that interests him, but who dared to proclaim himself the principle
and ultimate reason of all reality... Secularizing and profane humanism has
appeared finally in its terrible stature, and in a certain sense defied the
Council. The religion of God Who became man, has encountered the religion
(for it is one) of man who makes himself God. What happened? A clash, a
battle, an anathema? This could have happened, but it did not take place. You
modern humanists... recognize our new humanism: we too, more than anybody, have
the cult of man.”
Pope (now
Saint) Pius X had this to say in 1903 about the cult of man: “This according
to the same Apostle is the distinguishing mark of Antichrist, man has with
infinite temerity put himself in the place of God, raising himself above all
that is called God...” so that “He sitteth in the temple of God, showing
himself as if he were God.’(2 Thess. 2: 4)” (Pope St. Pius X, Our Apostolic
Mandate or E Supremi Apostolatus, 5). God had this to say about the cult of
man: “Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusts in man, and maketh
flesh his arm, and whose heart departs from the Lord.” (Jeremias 17: 5).
Paul VI was a
friend of Luciferians, Freemasons and Communists and murderers of Christians
and an enemy of good Catholics:
In the reign
of Pope Pius XII, Paul VI, then Archbishop Montini, was kicked out of Rome for
going behind Pope Pius XII back and collaborating with the Communists who
massacre Catholics and try to wipe out Christianity. When Paul VI became Pope,
the Church was made to drop its opposition to Communism, which never dropped
its opposition to Catholicism and its massacre of good Catholics. Paul VI was
bosom buddies with Saul Alinsky, a professional agitator expert and trainer
whose book Rules For Radicals was dedicated to Lucifer, the Devil. Many
U.S. Bishops sent their diocesan personnel to Alinsky’s training institute to
learn his tactics to implement Vatican II. The only method that ought to be
used by Catholic Bishops are those of the Gospels which the Church has used for
2,000 years, and which had Churches overflowing before Vatican II. Plain old
teaching, preaching, good example, and publications available at the back of
Churches. The Luciferian professional agitator tactics didn’t stop Catholics
leaving the renovated Church in droves!
Paul VI publicly
praised a self confessed Devil worshipper Cardonnel, admiring his works. Paul
VI was an ardent admirer of Jacques Maritain: “His status as a Catholic
philosopher again causes doubt since, on his own testimony, he had been
converted, not by any spiritual urge, not by any theological or historical
argument, but by the writings of Leon Bloy (1846-1917)... Bloy’s work is hardly
the stuff to convert to Christianity... he described himself as a prophet of
Lucifer... According to his own confession, Bloy was converted to what he and
his disciples called Christianity by the ravings of a poor prostitute who saw
visions, and who, after her affair with Bloy, died in a madhouse.” (The Broken
Cross, P.36, by Piers Compton, from Omni CBC Publications: 661-274-2240).
Freemasons
also approved of Paul VI: “A head of Freemasonry, Minister of State of the
Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite in France, Mr. Marsaudon, in his book:
‘Ecumenism From the Perspective of a Freemason of Tradition,’ speaking of all (Paul
VI) had done, wrote: ‘...One could really speak of a revolution that from
our Masonic Lodges has spread out magnificently, reaching the top of St.
Peter’s Basilica.” (Paul VI Beatified?, P. 316, Appendix 2, By Fr. Luigi Villa,
Th. D., from The Apostolate of Our Lady of Good Success).
“Woe to you when men shall bless you:
for according to these things did their fathers to the false prophets.” (Luke 6:
26).
Note: The problem with pleasing the likes of
Freemasons is that they are only pleased with what is evil and opposed to God.
Buzzwords like “liberal” and “revolution” are used by them for
propaganda purposes, but they have an inner significance different from what is
commonly understood. The word “revolution” means being in revolt from God: “unless there come a revolt first, and the
man of sin be revealed,” (2 Thess. 2: 3), and “liberty” as they use it,
means being free of the moral constraints of the Divine law, which is alone
that which makes us free in the true meaning of the word. “For the best results follow the Makers instructions.” “If you
continue in my word, you shall be My disciples indeed. And you shall know the
truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (Jn. 8: 31,32). There is no
greater tyrant than a liberal or a revolutionary. For example, Freemasons can
get the death penalty for ignoring commands given to them from their Masonic
superiors. The so-called liberal Vatican II establishment ignored and censured
good Catholics when they tried to complain of the perverts molesting our
children and destroying our liturgy. Good old guard priests who tried to complain
about the perverts who molested children had their faculties taken away and
were silenced. Notice also how homosexual and pro-abortion advocates
crush all opposition to themselves. Conservatives who advocate pro-life and
male/female marriage only, do not do the same, but they respect the opinions
and freedom of expression of those who disagree with them. And everyone knows
that “Catholics” regularly ignore the teachings of the Church with no
consequences for doing so, except excommunication for certain transgressions
before 1958.
A report
drawn up at the order of Fr. Arrupe, Superior General of the Jesuits, by Fr. Saenz
Arriga, Doctor of Philosophy and Canon Law, dated August 7, 1972, it said in
the words of Piers Compton: “Dealing with the past of Paul VI, it states
that from 1936-1950 he was prominent in a vast network of espionage that
covered some of the countries, on both sides, involved in the Second World War.
It goes on to say that he was a principle shareholder, with a Maronite
Archbishop, of a chain of brothels in Rome. He found the money for various
films, such as the erotic Temptations of Marianne, which he financed on
condition that the leading role was given to a certain actress named Patricia
Novarini. When not working for the movie studio, this young lady performed as a
striptease artist at the Crazy Horse Saloon, an exclusive night-club in Rome.”
(The Broken Cross, P. 110,111, by Piers Compton, 1984).
John
Paul I was not
killed because he was a conservative intent on turning back the tide of Vatican
II, as some Catholics think, but because, it is speculated, he intended to
clean out the Vatican Bank. It is clear that he was of the same ilk as John
XXIII and Paul VI. Statements made by him on the record, show that he was
opposed to the Divine law on birth control, and that he held to the sin and
heresy of indifferentism (ecumenism) as much as they did. Like his predecessor
Paul VI, he also publicly praised an avowed Satanist Giosue Carducci
(1835-1907) as a great educator. The Catholic Church has many Saints and holy
people who are great educators, but he chose to praise one dedicated to the
Devil instead. When he said Mass he had no crucifix. His loyalty is not to
Jesus Christ, but to the revolution..
St.
Robert Bellarmine: in De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: “… for
men are not bound, or able to read hearts; BUT WHEN THEY SEE THAT SOMEONE IS A HERETIC
BY HIS EXTERNAL WORKS, THEY JUDGE HIM TO BE A HERETIC PURE AND SIMPLE, AND
CONDEMN HIM AS A HERETIC”.
John Paul II was such an
ecumaniac that he could not pay homage to false Gods and their priests and
ministers enough. He wore himself out holding and travelling to events where he
prayed in union with every religion, cult and sect in the world, visiting Pagan
temples and taking part in their ceremonies.
The
Council of Elvira, A.D. 305: “It has been
decreed that those who in adult age after receiving Baptism shall go into the
pagan temples to worship idols, which is a deadly crime and the height of
wickedness, shall not be admitted to communion even at death”. (Quoted from:
“What Really Happened To The Catholic Church After Vatican II”, Ch. 16, P. 185,
by Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond: VaticanCatholic.Com.).
- In 1986 he shocked the Catholic world by
holding an interfaith service at Assisi, Italy, where every false religion in
the world held prayers together in the Catholic Basilica there. During the
ceremony an idol of Buddha was placed on the tabernacle, which is the holy of
holies.
- Feb. 2, 1986 John Paul II received the sign
of the adorers of Shiva, a Hindu deity on his forehead.
- March 24, 2000 John Paul sat in a chair under
an upside-down cross during his visit to Israel. The upside-down cross is one
of the foremost symbols of Devil worship. It is true that St. Peter was
martyred on an upside down cross, however, the upside down cross was never a
symbol of Christianity, but only of Devil worship. Considering the apostate
actions of John Paul II, and the scandals, blasphemies, sacrileges and heresies
of the fruits of Vatican II, and that
the Jews are the ancient enemies of Christianity having an agenda to wipe out
Catholicism, and are behind Vatican II, the gesture speaks for itself.
"The
Jewish attitude towards Our Lord has not changed. 'The sovereign pontiffs' Pope
Gregory XIII wrote, 'ever anxious
for the conversion of the Jews, have received them kindly, have graciously
allowed them to dwell amongst their own subjects and have always striven with
pious zeal to draw them to the light of truth. In addition, they have helped
them to secure the necessaries of life, and have forbidden all to injure or
insult them and to their benevolence have bestowed many priveleges on them for
their protection. The Jews, however, in no way softened by these benefits, and with
their ancient anti-Christian attitude unchanged, do not cease, in their
Synagogues and everywhere, to rage against Our Lord Jesus Christ, now
gloriously reigning in Heaven. Moved by an intense hatred of the members of
Christ, they continue to plan horrible crimes against the Christian religion
with daily increasing audacity...' Pope (now Saint) Pius V expelled the Jews from the whole
territory of the Papal States... In the letter 'Hebraeorum Gens' he explains
why he did so: 'Their wickedness which has been developed by every evil art, has
now reached such a point that, in view of our common safety, We feel it
expedient to check the spread of such a disease by applying a speedy remedy. We
have clear and definite proof of how this perverse race hates the name of
Christ, how hostile they are to all who bear His name, and by what tricks and
frauds they plot against the lives of Christians" (Apologia Pro Vita Mea, by Fr. Denis Fahey C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A.,
Professor of Philosophy and Church History, Holy Ghost Missionary College,
Kimmage, Dublin, Ireland).
“His Excellency
Right Rev. Antonio Garcia, Bishop of Tuy, one of the signatories of the letter
of the Spanish hierarchy, 1937, has summed up…: It is evident that the present
conflict is one of the most terrible wars waged by Antichrist, that is, by
Judaism against the Catholic Church and against Christ (referring to
the so-called Spanish Civil War). At this
crisis in the history of the world, Jewry uses two formidable armies: one
secret, namely that of Freemasonry; the other open and avowed, with hands
dripping with blood, that of the Communists and all other associated bodies”. (The
Kingship of Christ & the Conversion of the Jewish Nation, P. 54, Ch. 4, by
Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., D.D., Ph.D., B.A., Professor of Philosophy and
History, Imprimatur (Church approval)1953).From
Omni Publications, Ph. (661) 274-2240.
“On attaining
the 18th Degree, a Grand Orient Mason automatically becomes a member
of the Alliance Israelite Universelle… The A.I.U. therefore was destined to be
the governmental representative of all Jews from whatever country they lived in
under the authority of their secret Kahal or community rule… The A.I.U. saw its
dream of international Jewish government shattered when Zionism emerged and
came to the fore in 1897. It is noteworthy that the “Prophet” of Zionism: Ahad
Ha’am (Asher Ginsberg) was a member of A.I.U. and a disciple of Charles Netter.
The avowed aims of A.I.U. namely a super-government of the world and a
universal religion, both to be Judaic, are being steadily pursued by the
“Jewish World Agency” functioning today”. (Occult Theocracy, P. 340, Ch. 41,
Bk. I, & P. 487, Ch. 84, Bk. II, by Lady Queenborough).
When
Protestant pastors rave about the Catholic Church being the Antichrist, they show
this footage of John Paul II in Israel with his upside-down Cross. However, in
answer to that, it ought to be remarked that until 1958 the Catholic Church was
Biblically correct, and the true Popes were servants of Jesus Christ.
Pope
Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes
and preaches that all those who are
outside the Catholic Church, not only Pagans, but also Jews or heretics and
schismatic’s, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting
fire which was prepared for the Devil and his angels, unless they are joined to
the Church at the end of their lives”
Besides
Ecumenism, John Paul II taught many heresies, especially that all men are
saved. He denied the redemption, and he undermined Divinely revealed dogma
regarding sin and Hell. Some Catholics speculate that there has never been a
greater heretic in all of history than John Paul II, but then came Benedict.
Benedict XVI
has systematically contradicted the Catholic faith and denied Catholic dogma,
and like his predecessors he has repeated acts of apostasy by praying with
non-Catholic and non-Christian religions. He has denied the need for infant
baptism in his book “God and the World,” 2000, P. 401, he has denied that
outside the Church there is no salvation, contradicting Sacred Scripture and
Catholic dogma. He has said that the Old Covenant (the Synagogue) was not
abolished by God when the Bible and the Church has always taught that it was (the
Pontifical Biblical Commission issued a document in 2001 that said this, when
he as Cardinal Ratzinger was prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the
Faith. He has continued to uphold this by his words and actions, again contradicting
Catholic dogma and Sacred Scripture*). “By the death of our Redeemer”, says Pope Pius XII in his encyclical Mystici Corporis, “the New Testament took the place of the
Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries,
enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in
the blood of Jesus Christ... was there effected a transfer from the Law to the
Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from many sacrifices to one Victim,
that, as Our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part
of the Temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom. On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to
be buried and a bearer of death” (Ibid. 29,30).
- He
has maintained that people outside the Church, especially those in false
religions do not have to join the Church if they want to be in Gods camp and be
saved from eternal Hellfire after death (Benedict XVI address to Protestants at
World Youth Day, Aug. 19, 2005, and his prefect for Promoting Christian Unity,
Cardinal Walter Kasper, said the same).
- His
administration has stopped well meaning and sincere people and even pastors
with whole congregations who wanted to come into the Church. This betrays
Almighty God Himself and the reason He founded the Church, which was to save
all people of all nations. “He who causes
a sinner to be converted from the error of his way, shall save his soul from
death, and shall cover a multitude of sins.” (James 5: 20). If the reward
in Heaven is so great for bringing even one soul into the way of salvation,
conversely, what will be the punishments of those Pharisees? “Woe to you scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites; because you shut the kingdom of Heaven against men, for you yourselves
do not enter in; and those that are going in, you suffer not to enter.” (Matt.
23: 13). People who want to be Catholic but who get turned away, should
remember the quotes from Mystici Corporis
by Pope Pius XII and from Satis Cognitum by
Pope Leo XIII in the second paragraph. Even a Pope can’t stop you from keeping
the true faith and being baptized+.
If
the Devil himself could don papal attire, he couldn’t do more than what these
apostate and traitorous men are doing to the Church. Needless to say, Benedict
XVI theology is the “Modernism” condemned by a true Pope St. Pius X in 1907,
not the Catholic Faith. He admitted as much by saying that Vatican II was the
counterSyllabus (Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, P. 381). The Syllabus of Errors by Pope Pius IX
was a vigorous statement of Catholic doctrine condemning the modern errors that
had sprung up since the French revolution. The significance of the French
revolution was the triumph of Freemasonry in the French state.
Note: Pope Pius X was not condemning being modern,
but only the very old philosophy of Gnosticism clothed as progress, and the
Godlessness and immorality of modernity in this era. "Every scribe instructed in the kingdom of Heaven is like a
householder who brings forth from his treasure things old and new" (Matt. 13: 52).
* “Now if the ministration of death, engraven
with letters upon stones, was glorious; so that the children of Israel could
not steadfastly behold the face of Moses, for the glory of his countenance, which is made void. How shall not the
ministration of the spirit be rather in glory?... For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth
(the
Church of the New Testament) is in
glory.” (2 Corinthians 3: 7-14). St. Paul repeats this in different words
two more times in this place, and there are several more passages in the New
Testament that say the same thing. These Antipope churchmen, Freemasons not
Catholics, must think that no-one reads the Bible anymore and cannot see that
their new party line flatly contradicts the Bible, which The Council of Trent
told us in its Decree On The Canonical Scriptures “was dictated by God.” They also contradict what the Catholic
Church has always taught in the past! They obviously figure that those of us
who know enough to hold with the historic and traditional Catholic Church in
order to be with God and to gain salvation, are too few to bother themselves
about. But where God is, there is the future. “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you
have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.” (2 Thessalonians 2: 14).
When the Church began, its founder was crucified, and all His Apostles except
one abandoned Him. The Church then was three women and one man gathered around
the crucified Christ. A few days later, Christ was risen from the dead, and there
were twelve. After Christ ascended into Heaven, at Pentecost, another 3,000
souls were added to the Church (Acts 2: 41), and so on, and so on...
+ How To Baptize In Emergency or If Unjustly
Refused:
No one willing to believe all that the Catholic Faith believes and teaches
because God has revealed it, or infants, may be justly refused Baptism. If
there is no emergency, those over the age of 7 should acquaint themselves with
the teachings of the Baltimore Catechism first. Also Google: Catholic Harbour
of Faith and Morals.
The Council of Trent: “Those who may administer Baptism in case of
necessity, but without its solemn ceremonies, hold the last place; and in this
class are included all, even the laity, men and women, to whatever sect they
belong. This office extends in case of necessity, even to Jews, infidels and
heretics, provided, however, they intend to do what the Catholic Church does in
that act of her ministry. These things were established by many decrees of the
ancient Fathers and Councils; and the holy Council of Trent denounces anathema
against those who dare say, ‘that Baptism, even when administered by heretics,
in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, with the
intention of doing what the Church does, is not true Baptism’.” (Catechism of
the Council of Trent, Baptism: Ministers In Case of Necessity, P. 173). From Tan Books
Ph. 1-800-437-5876)
How To Baptize: “Take common water, pour it on the head or face of
the child (or adult) and while pouring it, say: I Baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost.” (Official Roman Missal, 1958). Do not say,
amen. Keep to the words of the form, because it is necessary to observe the
proper form for validity.
It is the Catholic faith they want to destroy, because that is
what Christianity is, not the Catholic Church buildings, which they have taken
over and now use for their own ends. Author Alice Bailey, founder
of Lucis Trust*, publisher to the United Nations, wrote this in her book: Externalization of the Heirarchy, P. 511
& 510: “The three main channels through which preparation for the New Age
is going on might be regarded as the Church, the Masonic fraternity and the
educational field… eventually, there will appear the Church Universal, and its
definite outlines will appear towards the close of this century” (The New World
Order, Ch. 1, P. 5, 8, by Ralph Epperson). The word “Catholic” means
“universal”. This obviously refers to an unholy “Catholic” church: “The
Universal Church of Man”, to supplant the One, Holy and Apostolic Catholic
Church of the living God. It is logical and more Satanically correct to destroy
the Divine institution by taking it over by infiltration, and turning it into a
vehicle of the other cause. This “Liturgical Reform” was written about by Roca,
an apostate and Freemason in 1883: “‘The
Divine cult in an Ecumenical Council shall undergo a transformation that will
put it in harmony with the state of modern civilization’. Roca’s plan for the
introduction of Christianity into the Masonic “Universal Religion” provided
for: A) A doctrinal adaptation, which presupposed the equivalence of all cults
and religious views; B) New dogmas, primarily that of Evolution, which
presupposes Gnostic Pantheism and Integral Humanism, for the passage of the
mission of the Church from the mystical and sacramental (supernatural) sphere
to the political-social (natural) one; C) A rapprochement with Freemasonry; D)
The birth of the “priests of the future,” whom are to involve themselves with
the “social” and abandon the “supernatural”.” (Paul VI Beatified? Appendix 2:
“The 5 Pointed Star, Signature of the Papacy of Paul VI”, P. 316, by Fr. Luigi
Villa, Th.D.). Also, most sinister of all, on the picture of Baphomet, the
Devil as worshipped by the O.T.O. and the Rosicrucians with whom Roca was
associated, are the words: “Solve et
Coagula”, which expresses the Satanic agenda to break down and “reform.” God allows this to happen in these end
times, as Our Lady of Fatima gave Lucia to understand, in fulfillment of
Scripture as a punishment of sin.
* Formerly called “Lucifer Trust.” Lucifer
is the name of the Devil. Albert Pike, perhaps the most influential Masonic
writer ever, said on page 321 of his book Morals
& Dogma, which is the bible of Freemasonry, that Lucifer was the God of
Freemasonry, the Great Architect of the Universe. The U.N is a Masonic entity.
How is it that the majority of Catholics
seem to go along with all this? There was widespread bewilderment among Catholics
who were over the age of 25 in the 1960s, ‘70s, and ‘80s, and people left the
Church in droves then. Petitions to Rome were ignored, because all these bad
changes and abuses were about revolution and conquest, not about Catholicism. What
could Catholics do when the bishoprics and the papacy were all in the hands of
Masons and Jews who are intent of destroying the Church? If they knew the
theological principles expounded above, they could have done what many good
Catholics around the world did do: Wherefore, Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord,
and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father
to you; and you shall be My sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (2
Corinthians 6: 17,18). Like many faithful Catholics who went
underground, that is, they gathered around good priests who disassociated with
the Vatican II bishops and continued using the true Mass and the true sacraments
which Vatican II endeavoured to abolish (all the sacraments were changed by
Vatican II invalidating most of them, especially the new rite of priestly
ordination). The bishops who support Vatican II are heretics severed from the
Church and their appointments and consecrations as Bishops are almost certainly
invalid. The priests who do not go along with the heresy but who continue what
the Church has always done and approved in its legitimate authority are the
true Church before God, and out of them God will restore his Church.
The
media played their part in the conspiracy by ignoring it all except to give a
few Masonic triumphalist stories flaunting the blasphemy and treason being
committed in the high places of the Church now under their control.
The
generations that are under the age of 55 in 2012, have grown up with the
changes and the lack of Catholic education and are brainwashed by the media and
the new Church, and most of them do not know that the Church was ever other
than it is. It is naive to suppose that all Catholics know what they’re
supposed to be about, and live up to their religion, and are aware of the
issues that affect them. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The average
Catholic is a nominal Catholic who knows nothing about his religion or history.
So-called Catholics divorce and remarry, contracept, have sex outside of
marriage, watch shows and read books and magazines full of sin, work on Sundays,
and lie when it is convenient, like the rest of the world. That is why
Catholics these days blend in and don’t stand out from the crowd. That is why a
true Catholic boy or girl who believes in virginity until marriage, could not
find a boyfriend or a girlfriend who shares their morals, even though most of
the people they know are nominal Catholics. For the same reason employers do
not encounter Catholics who refuse to work on Sundays. Most Catholics have no
clue that the Church and Catholics have enemies. They have never heard of the
200 documents the Popes have issued publicly since 1738 condemning Freemasonry.
Still less have they ever heard of the censures of the Church against the
Synagogue Antichristianism. Most Catholics don’t know that the Inquisition was
concerned with a security problem the Church was faced with as the result of
Jewish infiltration and subversion. The Councils of Toledo and the Lateran
imposed canons to prevent Catholics falling prey to Jews, but they have never
heard of them, because the Church was taken over by its enemies, and Catholic
information and education was suppressed. It would never occur to the average
Catholic that the Catholic Church which has 1.2 billion adherents, worldwide, would
be the object of power hunger and political ambitions of the global elite. Even
the child sex abuse scandals, the shelving of Confession, the sacrileges of the
New Mass, allowing non-Catholics to receive Holy Communion, the new theology
which was condemned before by Pope (now Saint) Pius X in his encyclical Pascendi, Popes beginning to flatter and
participate in idolatry and false religions, did not alert them to the fact
that something is not quite right in the Church. They blindly accept anything
that comes down the pike, thinking that if Father says it’s alright, it must be
alright. Catholic education was taken away in the 1960s, and the religious
texts they replaced the Baltimore Catechism with are Dick and Jane readers
telling the kids how to be good ecumenists, but nothing more. Therefore, whole
generations have grown up with Masonic education, which makes Masons not
Catholics. Ask the average Catholic these days what a Mason is. If they know,
you can bet it is because they are Masons themselves, not because they are good
Catholics who know about On Freemasonry,
the encyclical by Pope Leo XIII condemning Freemasonry and calling it “The kingdom of Satan,” or Quo Graviora by Pope Leo XII or other
documents.
“For if thou
hadst walked in the way of God, thou hadst surely dwelt in peace forever. Learn
where is wisdom, where is strength, where is understanding: that thou mayest
know also where is length of days and life, where is the light of the eyes, and
peace.” (Baruch 3: 13,14).
. St. Basil The Great: 330-379 "Matters have come to
this pass: the people have left their houses of prayer, and assembled in the
deserts, a pitiable sight, women and children, old men, and men otherwise
infirm, wretchedly faring in the open air, amid the most profuse rains and
snow-storms and winds and frosts of winter, and again in summer, under a
scorching sun. To this they submit, because they will have no part in the
wicked Arian leaven".
To
reiterate the principle taught by Pope Pius XII in his encyclical Mystici Corporis,: “Only those are to be
considered members of the Church who profess the true faith and are baptized...
Not every sin, however grave it may be is such as of its own nature as to sever
a man from the Church as does heresy, schism, and apostasy.” And to repeat
what Pope Leo XIII taught in his encyclical Satis
Cognitum: “The doctrine of the
Apostles is the true faith.”
Vatican II: However far the Vatican II Antipopes may be
from what the Church has always taught, they were right in line with Vatican
II. This false Council contradicted the teaching of the Church and Sacred
Scriptures. In addition to the quote above from Patrick Henry Omlor showing how
Vatican II contradicted the teaching of the Church on Ecumenism word for word,
Vatican II teems with contradictions of the Catholic faith that are just as
serious.
The Vatican II Decree on non-Christian
Religions
says the following: “The Catholic Church
rejects nothing which is true and holy in these religions.” This is a
contradiction of the Catholic faith which has always asserted that it alone is
the only true religion revealed by God, the only religion that saves from
eternal Hellfire, and that every other is anathema, and leads its adherents to
eternal Hellfire, as Pope Pius XI said: “They
assert their readiness to treat with the Church of Rome, but on equal terms, as
equals with an equal. But even if they could so treat, there is little doubt
that they would do so only on condition that no pact into which they might
enter should compel them to retract those opinions which still keep them
outside the one fold of Christ. This being so, it is clear that the Apostolic
See can by no means take part in these assemblies, nor is it in any was lawful
for Catholics to give such enterprises their encouragement or support. If they did so, they would be giving
countenance to a false Christianity quite alien to the one Church of Christ.
Shall we commit the iniquity of suffering the truth, the truth revealed by God,
to be made the subject of compromise? For it is indeed a question of defending
revealed truth. Jesus Christ sent His Apostles into the whole world to declare
the faith of the Gospel to every nation, and, to save them from error... The
only begotten Son of God not only bade His representatives to teach all
nations; He also obliged all men to give credence to whatever was taught by
them ‘witnesses preordained by God’ (Acts !0: 41. Moreover He enforced His
command with this sanction: ‘He that believes and is baptized shall be saved; he
that believes not shall be condemned... Everyone knows that John himself, the
Apostle of love, who seems in his Gospel to have revealed the secrets of the
Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress upon the memory of his
disciples the new commandment ‘to love one another,’ nevertheless strictly
forbade any communication with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt form
of Christ’s teaching: ‘If any man come to you, and bring not this doctrine,
receive him not into the house, nor say to him, God speed you.’” (Mortalium
Animos, 8, 9, 10, Pope Pius XI, 1928). If the Pope speaks so about
non-Catholic Christians, how much more is it not so of non-Christian religions?
This
decree on non-Christian religions goes on to praise Hinduism, Buddhism, and
Islam, saying that these people worship God in their own way. Whereas the
Church has always maintained that these religions are idolatry and outside of
the kingdom of God, as the Bible says: “All
the gods of the gentiles are devils.” (Psalm 95: 5). “The things the heathens
sacrifice they sacrifice to Devils and not to God.” (1 Cor 10: 20). The
decree Cantate Domino quoted above is
typical of what the Church has always taught in opposition to Vatican II. The
Book of Deuteronomy in the Old Testament made very clear what Gods people are
to think of false religions: “Neither
shalt thou bring any thing of the idol into thy house, lest thou become an
anathema like it. Thou shalt detest it as dung, and shall utterly abhor it as
uncleanness and filth, because it is an anathema.” (Deut. 7: 26). “For it was
not enough for them to err about the knowledge of God, but whereas they lived
in a great war of ignorance, they called so many and so great evils peace… And
all things are mingled together, blood, murder, theft and dissimulation,
corruption and unfaithfulness, tumults and perjury, disquieting of the good, forgetfulness
of God, defiling of souls, changing of nature, disorder in marriage, and the
irregularity of adultery and uncleanness. For
the worship of abominable idols is the cause, and the beginning and end of all
evil.” (Wisdom 14: 22-27).
The
New Testament says the same: “Bear
not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with
injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath
Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And
what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the
living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will
be their God, and they will be My people. Wherefore, Go out from among them,
and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will
receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be My sons and
daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” (2 Corinthians 6: 14-18).
Regarding
the Jews and Moslems, Jesus Christ
said: “But He that does not believe, is
already judged: because He believes not in the name of the only begotten Son of
God.” (Jn. 3: 18). “He that believes not the Son, shall not see life; but the
wrath of God abides on Him.” (Jn. 3: 36). The Vatican II decree spoke of
recalling:”the spiritual bond linking the
people of the New Covenant with Abraham’s stock”. On the contrary, Sacred
Scripture and the Church teaches: “Know
ye therefore, that they who are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham”
(Gal. 3: 6, 7). There
is no spiritual bond between those who are of the true faith of Jesus Christ
and those who are not: “Therefore
there is no parity between the condition of those who have adhered to the
Catholic truth by the heavenly gift of faith, and of those who, led by human
opinions, follow a false religion. Without faith it is impossible to please
God, and to attain to the fellowship of His children.” (Dogmatic Constitution On The Catholic Faith: Of
Faith, Pope Pius IX, 1870). In the Old Testament, the Edomites,
the Moabites, the Samaritans, the ten lost tribes, and others were also
descendants of Abraham, but the only ones that God had regard to were the
tribes of Juda and Benjamin who continued faithful in His Covenant. But after
Christ, the Synagogue was abolished by God, as the quote from Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis above shows, and so the
true religion of the Old Testament passed into the New Testament in the
Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ, the God of Israel incarnate and the
one and only true Messiah.
The
following prayer sums up the teaching of the Church on non-Christian religions,
as opposed to Vatican II.
Consecration of the
Human Race To The Sacred Heart Of Jesus By
Pope Leo XIII, 1899.
“Most sweet Jesus, Redeemer of the human race, look down upon us humbly
prostrate before Thee. We are Thine, and Thine we wish to be; but to be more
surely united to Thee, behold each one of us freely consecrates himself today
to Thy Most Sacred Heart. Many indeed have never known Thee; many too,
despising Thy precepts, have rejected Thee. Have mercy on them all, most
merciful Jesus, and draw them to Thy Sacred Heart. Be Thou King, O Lord, not
only of the faithful who have never forsaken Thee, but also of the prodigal
children who have abandoned Thee; grant that they may quickly return to their
Fathers house lest they die of wretchedness and hunger. Be Thou King of those
who are deceived by erroneous opinions, or whom discord keeps aloof, and call
them back to the harbor of truth and unity of faith, so that soon there may be
one flock and one Shepherd. Be Thou King
of all those who are still involved in the darkness of idolatry or of Islamism,
and refuse not to draw them all into the light and the Kingdom of God. Turn
Thine eyes of mercy toward the children of that race, once Thy chosen people.
Of old they called down upon themselves the blood of the Savior; may it now
descend upon them as a laver of redemption and of life. Grant, O Lord to Thy Church assurance of freedom and
immunity from harm; give peace and order to all nations, and make the earth
resound from pole to pole with one cry: Praise to the Divine Heart that wrought
our salvation; to it be glory and honor forever. Amen”.
Vatican II on Sacred Scripture: The Vatican II decree declares that the Revelation
contained in Tradition is evolving. Opposed to this is the perennial teaching
and dogma of the Faith which says that the Revelation contained in Sacred
Scripture and Tradition is immutable: Oath
Against Modernism, Pope St. Pius X, 1910: “I sincerely accept the doctrine of the Faith in the same sense and
always with the same meaning as it has been handed down to us from the Apostles
through the officially approved Fathers. And therefore, I wholly reject the
heretical notion of the evolution of dogmas, according to which doctrines pass
from one sense to another sense alien to that which the Church has held from
the start…” Dogmatic Constitution On
The Catholic Faith, Of Faith and Reason, Pope Pius IX, 1870: “For the doctrine of the Faith which God has
revealed has not been proposed, like a philosophical invention, to be perfected
by human ingenuity; but has been delivered as a divine deposit to the Spouse of
Christ, to be faithfully kept and infallibly declared. Hence, also, that
meaning of the Sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained which our holy
Mother the Church has once declared; nor is that meaning ever to be departed
from, under the pretense or pretext of a deeper comprehension of them (can.iii).
Let then the intelligence, science and wisdom of each and all, of individuals
and of the whole Church, in all ages and all times, increase and flourish in
abundance and vigor; but simply in its own proper kind, that is to say, in one
and the same doctrine, one and the same judgment.” Canon III of the 1870 Council:
“If anyone shall assert it to be possible that sometimes, according to the
progress of science, a sense if to be given to doctrines propounded by the
Church different from that which the Church has understood and understands, let
him be anathema.”
“The beginning of Thy words is truth: all the judgments of Thy justice
are forever.” (Psalm 118: 160).
It must be remarked that the
Vatican II Decree on Sacred Scripture did not use the term “evolving,” it used
the vague expression of finding a deeper comprehension of them and the Masonic
buzzword “progress,” which practice has shown to mean the same thing as
evolution of dogma, as The Dogmatic Constitution on the Catholic Faith
indicated. Vatican II is rife with the use of vague expressions which to the
naive and unsuspecting might be taken in a sense compatible with orthodoxy.
However, the Church has condemned this in a clear and precise formula, as the
above quote shows. Catholics should never accept anything vague or ambiguous.
The Church before Vatican II never produced anything vague or ambiguous and was
an enemy of such things which are always a sign of falsehood. The use of vagueness,
whereby a thing would be stated in such a way as to leave open the possibility
of a heretical “interpretation,” is a Masonic ploy for creating a thin edge of
the wedge through which a truck full of heresy will be later driven. The true
teaching of the Church is clear and precise and admits of no heretical
interpretation, but on the contrary, it erects “an insurmountable barrier against any heresy,” as Cardinal
Ottaviani, Prefect for the Holy Office in 1969, described the true original
Catholic Mass from before Vatican II in his famous intervention with Paul VI
against the new Mass. The Vatican II documents are to be judged by their
fruits. “A good tree cannot bring forth
evil fruit.” (Matt. 7: 18). The documents of true Councils and true Popes
produced no bad fruits. The fruits of the Vatican II documents, however,
produced nothing but bad fruits and were used by every heretic and Antichrist
as scope under which to make heresy the order of the day after Vatican II and
to suppress and banish the true teaching.
Ordinary
people "have not informed themselves
of the mode of thinking and action of the Revolution. Even while soaking up its
corrosive incongruities and yielding to its influence, they do not see what
they are looking at... the basic error of most people is to read traditional
meanings and intentions into its language... How few people realize that the very soul of the revolution is
deception, and its total objective is influence... The Revolution has no
sympathy for the discontent or internal revulsion of individuals. It is
sufficient if the majority outwardly conforms, thus contributing to the
illusion it is creating for the masses. Individuals who will not conform, must
somehow be removed from the others as they threaten to dispel the illusion of
the others. Nor does the Revolution use words as ordinary human beings do...
language is a means of furtherance of the Revolutionary program. It is used as
a tool, or better, as a weapon, since the program is a phase, and language is a
tactic in the struggle for influencing people, not for communicating truth... The "New Mass" is one of the
productions of the Revolution, one of its tools of subversion, and the language
of the "New Mass" is in the genre of the Revolution. Those who
mean to assess the "New Mass" should not expect to find in it the
clarity of thought and intention which one expects in the articulations of
the Sacred Magisterium of the Church. They
should not expect to find clear-cut affirmations and negations. They will find
truth suggested - as well as many shades of its opposite. The only constancy
they will find, is the effort to confuse and mislead, a refusal to debate
fairly... A Revolutionary will
believe whatever it serves his immediate purpose to believe... their words are
chosen always with a view to inching the thought of the masses into the
direction of the Revolutionary negations; away, therefore, from objective
truth... supernatural verities, dogmas, and laws... The Revolution being
indifferent to truth or human feeling (but keenly aware of the usefulness of
both), will promise anything, give every impression of sincerity, create as
convincing a rationale as possible... any change is progress... Exploiting the poor memory, the ignorance,
the guilelessness, and the indifference of those who will sacrifice anything
to be free of further annoyance (who
will surrender every principle, in order not to be thought odd by the
majority...) ... being sure to ignore and put to silence all reminders of
previous promises for a few minutes
peace (which is never permitted, of course) they will allow themselves to be
treated like curs". (The Great Sacrilege, Ch. 5, P. 313-133, by Fr. J. F.
Wathen, O.S.J.). Available from (574) 643-9296.
What kind of men were those
bishops that could let such a thing happen? And why did nobody speak up? The
answer to that is that the Church was infiltrated and stacked with enemy agents
who were emissaries of Freemasonry. Faithful servants of Jesus Christ would
never permit such a thing to happen. The few bishops who were men of God did
try to speak up but they were suppressed, removed, and denied any voice. But even
some of them did not remain faithful, but capitulated to underhanded efforts of
the enemy to “turn” them.
“But some of
those present seemed to have little grounding, not only in Latin, but in the
essentials of their Faith. Their background was not that of the orthodox (which means of
correct belief) traditional Catholic; and
those who were part of that background, and who were familiar with the writings
of Heidegger and Jean Paul Sartre could detect, in the statements and even
casual remarks made by all too many prelates, the equivocations and lack of
authority habitual to men who are the products of modern thought. More than
that, some let it be known that they did not believe in Transubstantiation, and
therefore, not in the Mass. But they held firmly by Nietzsche’s pride in life,
and the deification of human reason, while rejecting the idea of an Absolute,
and the concept of creation. One Bishop from Latin America expressed his
bewilderment mildly by saying that many of his fellow prelates appear to have
lost their faith. Another was frankly horrified to discover that some to whom
he had spoken, and who had but temporarily put aside their mitres, scorned any
mention of the Trinity and the Virgin Birth. Their background owed nothing to
the Thomist philosophy, and one veteran of the Curia, inured to the firmness of
the Roman pavement, made short work of the Council Fathers by summing them up
as 2,000 good-for-nothings. There were some among the bitterly disillusioned
who said they would merely put in a token appearance for a week or two, and
then go home. Representatives from the Middle East recalled a warning that had
been uttered by Salah Bitah, the Premier of Syria, when first he heard that the
Council was being called. He had reason to believe that the Council was nothing
but an ‘international plot.’ Others supported that definition by producing a
book, which has been handed to them on landing at the airport, in which it was
said that the Council was part of a plan to destroy the Church’s doctrine and
practice, then, ultimately, the Institution itself’” (The Broken Cross, P. 46,
by Piers Compton).
What
this quote shows, and the reality of most bishops and churchmen of the
post-Vatican II church show that what the author describes is realistic, is
that most of those men were heretics and apostates, and were thus
excommunicated and ineligible to participate in a Church Council. The following
is a description of a true Church Council by St. Francis De Sales, Bishop and
Doctor of the Church.
“Thou hast
despised all them that fall off from Thy judgments; for their thought in
unjust.” (Psalm 118: 118).
St. Francis DeSales: A True Church
Council
"One
could not better trace out a true and holy council than on the pattern of that
which the Apostles held at Jerusalem... The Apostles and ancients came together
to consider the matter. And in truth it is the pastors who are charged to
instruct the people and to provide for their salvation by resolving the doubts
which arise touching Christian doctrine... For what are the principal causes
why General Councils are assembled, save to put down and cast out the heretic,
the schismatic, the scandalizer, as wolves from the sheepfold" (St. Francis De Sales, The Catholic
Controversy, Art.4: The Qualities of A True Council, p.217, Tan Books).
"But
all this is to be understood of true Councils", says St. Francis:
"There is nothing so certain but that it can meet with opposition, but
truth remains firm and is glorified by the assaults of what is contrary to
it... And those prophets were not legitimate or acknowledged as such ... when
he said: 'Is there here not some prophet of the Lord that we may inquire of
him? -as if he would say that the others were not prophets of the Lord,” he
said, referring to "the assembly of priests against Our Lord" (Ibid. P. 232, 234). "The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of
prophecy" (Apoc. 19: 10).
Concerning
the Infallible Teaching of the Roman Pontiff, Vatican Council, 1870: "For the Holy Spirit
was not promised to the successors of Peter, that by His revelation they might
make known new doctrine, but that by His
assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation or
deposit of faith delivered through the Apostles."
“Thy justice is justice forever: and Thy law is the truth... Thy
testimonies are justice forever.” (Psalm 118: 142, 144).
Pope Pius II, 1458-64, in his
Papal Bull Execrabilis stated that any
Council called to make substantial change in the Church is beforehand decreed
to be void and annulled! Only changes that are not substantial, but which are
improvements in keeping intact that which has been handed down from Apostolic
tradition, or censuring, correcting or removing the unworthy, are the office of
a Church Council. A true Church Council would excommunicate the entire
hierarchy of Vatican II, anathematize Vatican II and the new Mass and new
sacraments and restore the former pre-Vatican II rites, and select only worthy
candidates for the priesthood and hierarchy: “...Choose out men... that have given their lives for the name of our
Lord Jesus Christ.” (Acts 15: 25, 26). “Provide out of all the people able men,
such as fear God, in whom there is truth, and that hate avarice, and appoint
them rulers of thousands, and of hundreds, and of fifties, and of tens.”
(Exodus 18: 21).
“For other foundation no man can lay, but that which is laid; which is
Christ Jesus.” (1 Cor. 3: 11).
Prayer to St. Michael from the Rite of Exorcism (Approved 18 May
1890.)
NOTE:
In 1902 the Congregation of Rites issued a decree approving a new version of
the prayer. The passages indicated in bold face below were removed. The
entire prayer was composed by Pope Leo XIII after a vision he was given by God
of the future of the Church. In that vision Satan confronted Jesus Christ and
said that in 100 years he would destroy the Church. Jesus gave him liberty to
do so in order to punish the world for sin.
O
GLORIOUS ARCHANGEL St Michael, Prince of the heavenly host, defend us in
battle, and in the struggle which is ours against the principalities and
Powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against spirits of evil
in high places. (Eph 6.) Come to the aid of men, whom God created immortal,
made in his own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the
tyranny of the devil, (Wis 2, 1 Cor 6.)
Fight this day
the battle of the Lord, together with the holy angels, as already thou hast
fought the leader of the proud angels, Lucifer, and his apostate host, who were
powerless to resist thee, nor was there place for them any longer in Heaven,
But that cruel, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil or Satan, who
seduces the whole world, was cast into the abyss with all his angels, (Apoc
12.)
Behold, this
primeval enemy and slayer of man has taken courage, transformed into an angel
of light, he wanders about with all the multitude of wicked spirits, invading
the earth in order to blot out the name of God and of his Christ, to seize
upon, slay and cast into eternal perdition souls destined for the crown of
eternal glory. This wicked dragon pours out, as a most impure flood, the venom
of his malice on men of depraved mind and corrupt heart, the spirit of lying,
of impiety, of blasphemy, and the pestilent breath of impurity, and of every
vice and iniquity.
These most
crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church,
the spouse of the Immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most
sacred possessions.
In the Holy
Place itself, where has been set up the See of the most holy Peter and the
Chair of Truth for the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their
abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been
struck, the sheep may be scattered.
Arise then, O
invincible prince, bring help against the attacks of the lost spirits to the
people of God, and bring them the victory.
The Church venerates thee as protector and patron; in thee holy Church glories as her defence against the malicious powers of this world and of hell; to thee has God entrusted the souls of men to be established in heavenly beatitude.
The Church venerates thee as protector and patron; in thee holy Church glories as her defence against the malicious powers of this world and of hell; to thee has God entrusted the souls of men to be established in heavenly beatitude.
Oh,
pray to the God of peace that He may put Satan under our feet, so far conquered
that he may no longer be able to hold men in captivity and harm the Church.
Offer our prayers in the sight of the Most High, so that they may quickly
conciliate the mercies of the Lord; and beating down the dragon, the ancient
serpent, who is the devil and Satan, do thou again make him captive in the
abyss, that he may no longer seduce the nations.
“Many are they
that persecute me, and afflict me; but I have not declined from Thy
testimonies.” (Psalm 118: 157).
